Leonardo Iemmi vs Daniel Aleksandar Amarandei Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Which player has shown better second serve performance recently? Iemmi leads slightly, winning 42.97% of points on their second serve, compared to Amarandei's 40.74%.
• Amarandei demonstrates superior return game statistics, capturing 57.89% of opponents' second serve points, whereas Iemmi averages 47.67%.
• Amarandei is more effective on first serve returns, winning 35.29% of those points, surpassing Iemmi's 26.74%.
• In pressure situations, who has been more successful? Iemmi excels in saving breakpoints, achieving a 67.39% save rate against Amarandei’s 57.14%.
• Considering their yearly performance, Amarandei maintains a 100% win rate, albeit in fewer matches (W/L 1/0), while Iemmi holds a 48.15% win-loss record (W/L 13/14).
• Surface preferences show Amarandei excels on Clay with a perfect record (100%, W/L 1/0), whereas Iemmi’s best results come on Hard courts with a 46% win rate (W/L 6/7).
• Amarandei’s career level matches are primarily from the lower-tier tournaments, matching their tournament level success (100%, W/L 1/0), while Iemmi also competes at similar levels, winning 48.15% of matches (W/L 13/14).
• A notable disparity is the quality of opponents faced, with Amarandei competing mainly against unranked players, whereas Iemmi encounters opponents averaging a rank of 131.44.
• Amarandei struggles in deciding sets, winning none in the past year, while Iemmi has a 50% success rate in such situations.
• Amarandei has a better recent breakpoint conversion rate, capitalizing on 50% of opportunities compared to Iemmi's 33.33%.

Editorial Prediction (September 2, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming match presents an interesting dynamic between Amarandei's strong returning ability and Iemmi's consistent performance under pressure. Despite Amarandei's perfect win record in the past year, it must be noted their competition level has been considerably lower, often against unranked players.

In terms of recent second serve points, Iemmi holds a slight advantage, but Amarandei’s superior ability to convert breakpoints could be crucial, especially in key game situations. Amarandei’s greater success in immediate returns suggests they can potentially counter Iemmi’s slight serve superiority.

Iemmi demonstrates resilience in high-pressure scenarios, particularly when saving break points and during deciding sets, giving them an edge in tightly contested matches. Amarandei’s lack of exposure to competition at Iemmi’s experienced level might hinder their performance under duress.

Given these factors, Iemmi appears more likely to claim victory in this matchup, possessing both the experience of higher-tier competition and a track record of withstanding pressure effectively.